Implement no associative infix op for precedence!{}#413
Open
A4-Tacks wants to merge 6 commits into
Open
Conversation
5ca10ae to
d446221
Compare
Owner
|
Rebased this and tweaked the test to use "<" and ">" as the example non-associative operators rather than "+" to demonstrate an example use case. But I found a problem with it: I added a left-associative "||" that binds weaker than "<" and ">" but this doesn't work correctly -- it should be allowed to have an associative operator with non-associative arguments, but the new boolean result propagates up and prevents that operator from being parsed. |
Contributor
Author
|
I have implemented a tests passed parser But I suspect it has more hidden problems, and it's a bit unsightly (The |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Like
a:@ "<" b:@ {}Part of #404